tested with dir type.
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-create-as tmp-pool tmp-vol 1G
Vol tmp-vol created
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-list --pool tmp-pool --details
Name Path Type Capacity Allocation
-------------------------------------------------------------
tmp-vol /root/tmp-pool/tmp-vol file 1.00 GiB 1.00 GiB
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-resize tmp-vol --pool tmp-pool 2G
Size of volume 'tmp-vol' successfully changed to 2G
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-list --pool tmp-pool --details
Name Path Type Capacity Allocation
-------------------------------------------------------------
tmp-vol /root/tmp-pool/tmp-vol file 2.00 GiB 1.00 GiB
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-resize tmp-vol --pool tmp-pool 3G --allocate
Size of volume 'tmp-vol' successfully changed to 3G
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-list --pool tmp-pool --details
Name Path Type Capacity Allocation
-------------------------------------------------------------
tmp-vol /root/tmp-pool/tmp-vol file 3.00 GiB 3.00 GiB
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 02:29:15PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
From: Wang Sen <wangsen(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Currently, 'vol-resize --allocate' allocates new space at the
vol->capacity offset. But the vol->capacity is not necessarily the same
as vol->allocation. For instance:.
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-list --pool tmp-pool --details
Name Path Type Capacity Allocation
-------------------------------------------------------------
tmp-vol /root/tmp-pool/tmp-vol file 1.00 GiB 1.00 GiB
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-resize tmp-vol --pool tmp-pool 2G
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-list --pool tmp-pool --details
Name Path Type Capacity Allocation
-------------------------------------------------------------
tmp-vol /root/tmp-pool/tmp-vol file 2.00 GiB 1.00 GiB
So, if we want to allocate more bytes, so the file is say 3G big, the
real allocated size is 2G actually:
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-resize tmp-vol --pool tmp-pool 3G --allocate
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-list --pool tmp-pool --details
Name Path Type Capacity Allocation
-------------------------------------------------------------
tmp-vol /root/tmp-pool/tmp-vol file 3.00 GiB 2.00 GiB
This commit uses the correct vol->allocation instead of incorrect
vol->capacity, so the output of the commands above looks like this:
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-resize tmp-vol --pool tmp-pool 3G --allocate
[root@localhost ~]# virsh vol-list --pool tmp-pool --details
Name Path Type Capacity Allocation
-------------------------------------------------------------
tmp-vol /root/tmp-pool/tmp-vol file 3.00 GiB 3.00 GiB
Moreover, if the '--alocate' flag was used, we must update the
vol->allocation member in storageVolResize API too, not just
vol->capacity.
Reported-by: Wang Sen <wangsen(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
---
src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c | 2 +-
src/storage/storage_driver.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c b/src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c
index 11cf2df..95783be 100644
--- a/src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c
+++ b/src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c
@@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ virStorageBackendFileSystemVolResize(virConnectPtr conn
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
if (vol->target.format == VIR_STORAGE_FILE_RAW) {
return virStorageFileResize(vol->target.path, capacity,
- vol->capacity, pre_allocate);
+ vol->allocation, pre_allocate);
} else {
if (pre_allocate) {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_driver.c b/src/storage/storage_driver.c
index f08255e..816efda 100644
--- a/src/storage/storage_driver.c
+++ b/src/storage/storage_driver.c
@@ -2029,6 +2029,8 @@ storageVolResize(virStorageVolPtr obj,
goto out;
vol->capacity = abs_capacity;
+ if (flags & VIR_STORAGE_VOL_RESIZE_ALLOCATE)
+ vol->allocation = abs_capacity;
/* Update pool metadata */
pool->def->allocation += (abs_capacity - vol->capacity);
--
1.8.5.1
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list