On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 06:19:38PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 07:15:18PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 06:02:20PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2025 at 03:09:00PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com> --- src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c index 3f9b583985..9ca0847789 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c @@ -5222,6 +5222,47 @@ qemuBuildHostdevSCSICommandLine(virCommand *cmd, }
+static int +qemuBuildAcpiNodesetProps(virCommand *cmd, + virDomainDeviceInfo *info, + virQEMUCaps *qemuCaps) +{ + static unsigned int giIndex; + int node = -1; + + if (!info->acpiNodeset) + return 0; + + if (!virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_ACPI_GENERIC_INITIATOR)) + return -1;
We can assume the validate function already ran, so we don't need this check here, which is good as this would return an error status without setting an error message.
Ah yes, this check is redundant, we can definitely drop it. Should I send an update patch just with this change?
Don't bother. The rest of the series is fine, so I'll make the obvious change and push this once I've validated it in CI.
Ok, thanks! -Andrea