On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:08:57PM +0100, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:50:20AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
> > + <ul>
> > + <li><a
href="downloads.html">Download</a></li>
> > + <li><a
href="contribute.html">Contribute</a></li>
> > + <li><a
href="docs.html">Learn</a></li>
>
> This was already pointed out by Martin and I also find "Learn" confusing.
> I usually looks for "Documentation".
I thought so, too. But I found Dan's comment convincing (from a native
speaker's POV):
I didn't use "Documentation" because everything on the website is
"Documentation", so it doesn't really add any categorization benefit
IMHO.
I don't think that's true, not everything on the website is
"Documentation".
The main menu contains "Download" which is not a documentation and also
"Contribute" which is more like guideline.
For example take a look at <
https://www.openstack.org/>, there is "LEARN"
and
"DOCS" in the main menu and the content of LEARN is not a Documentation at all.
Another example of possible new QEMU web <
http://www.quasiquark.com/>, they also
use Documentation.
Pavel