On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Christophe Fergeau
<cfergeau(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> What would _USB2 do? Add an _EHCI controller, plus either
> _PIIX3_UHCI or _PIIX4_UHCI?
>From what I remember Hans told me, all the 4 ehci + uhci companions
controllers are needed for a proper USB2 setup.
I suggest an enum value such as
CONFIG_DOMAIN_SETUP_USB_CONTROLLERS_USB2 for default USB2 setup (using
the ICH9 controllers, but could be changed someday perhaps)
When we get into such discussions, I question whether the API is
appropriate for libvirt-gconfig. This API should be focusing on
the mechanism for creating guest configs & trying to avoid policy
based questions, which can be left upto higher level apps/APIs.
The concept of 'default usb controllers' seems very policy based
to me & different hypervisors will have different views of this.
So IMHO we should not add this API
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|