17 Sep
2018
17 Sep
'18
2:26 p.m.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 13:22:59 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
A side effect of recent changes is that we would always try to regenerate the capabilities cache for non-native QEMU binaries based on /dev/kvm availability, which is of course complete nonsense. Make sure that doesn't happen.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> --- A better spot would be between 3/5 and 4/5, but the order doesn't make any difference functionality-wise so 6/5 it is for the sake of mailing list archives :)
You could have used 3.5/5, it wouldn't be the first patch with similar numbering :-) Series Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>