On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 13:22:59 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
A side effect of recent changes is that we would always try
to regenerate the capabilities cache for non-native QEMU
binaries based on /dev/kvm availability, which is of course
complete nonsense. Make sure that doesn't happen.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
---
A better spot would be between 3/5 and 4/5, but the order
doesn't make any difference functionality-wise so 6/5 it is
for the sake of mailing list archives :)
You could have used 3.5/5, it wouldn't be the first patch with similar
numbering :-)
Series
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>