On 2/25/19 9:53 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 2/9/19 9:41 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 2/6/19 2:18 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Right now, we only use NBD exports during storage migration,
>> where we control the NBD client and therefore don't care about
>> the export name (qemu's default of naming the export after the
>> device is fine). But upcoming patches for exposing backups over
>> NBD wants to use a different export name (matching the libvirt
>> domain XML rather than the qemu device name); so enhance the
>> QMP glue code to allow this flexibility.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h | 1 +
>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h | 1 +
>> src/qemu/qemu_migration.c | 2 +-
>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c | 5 +++--
>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c | 2 ++
>> tests/qemumonitorjsontest.c | 2 +-
>> 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>
> I assume/hope some day a test will be added that will show what the
> @export variable does. I haven't read ahead at all - I'm trying to just
> go in order and get some feedback sooner so you can start pushing stuff.
>
> Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
Yes, I need to do better at in-tree tests (and not just stuff I've
mentioned in the commit messages) for my v5. The export name gets used
during pull-style backups, where I purposefully went with naming the
exports 'vda' and 'vdb' for a guest with two disks, rather than based on
any file name or block node name; 'qemu-nbd --list' connected to the NBD
server during a pull backup is an easy way of testing the export names
made it through the stack.
For that matter, I'm probably just going to squash this patch in with
15/20, and do all the QMP monitor changes in one patch.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:
qemu.org |
libvirt.org