On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:28:47PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:33:48PM +0800, Guannan Ren wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:40 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
Thanks Guannan:
https://github.com/autotest/autotest/commit/ba4b748e7b9a9bfe7898a97cdccdc9b8...
Cheers,
Lucas
That's great, thank Lucas.
yes excellent to both of you :-) yay !!!
This is the initial version, we need to maintain it later on. If that, the patch will be sent to autotest mainling list, is that right?
Yes I would think that's the normal place (for now). The very first thing I would suggest is to get a new TCK release as the one referenced is realy ancient : -rw-r--r-- 1 berrange www 40996 Jul 22 2009 Sys-Virt-TCK-0.1.0.tar.gz We should try to iron out possible issues when running the TCK from autotest, then make a new release, put it on ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/tck/ and update the upstream autotest with it.
Yes, my bad. We should fix libvirt and/or the TCK so that it passes, and then cut a new release. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|