On 09/17/2011 05:06 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/16/2011 09:51 AM, ajia(a)redhat.com wrote:
> From: Alex Jia<ajia(a)redhat.com>
>
> * src/qemu/qemu_command.c: missing return value check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Jia<ajia(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> index 5f0de40..e8b1157 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> @@ -1702,7 +1702,8 @@ qemuBuildDriveDevStr(virDomainDiskDefPtr disk,
> virBufferAsprintf(&opt, ",event_idx=%s",
>
> virDomainVirtioEventIdxTypeToString(disk->event_idx));
> }
> - qemuBuildDeviceAddressStr(&opt,&disk->info, qemuCaps);
> + if (qemuBuildDeviceAddressStr(&opt,&disk->info, qemuCaps)<
0)
> + goto error;
ACK and pushed. I'm assuming you found this with a static analyzer?
Hi Eric,
It seems ccc-analyzer keeps silence for this, so I'm trying Coverity to
analyse codes,
the above issues are catched by Coverity.
BTW, I want to apply join coverity-users mail listing, and sent a email
to Jeff cc to you & DV,
but I haven't received any reply, so I try to find some Coverity
resources myself and
run it on libvirt source codes.
Thanks & Regards,
Alex