Thanks for your clarification.
I am using 2.6.38-8-server kernel.
Will test with 3.0.0 kernel
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Stefan Berger
<stefanb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
On 08/11/2011 09:39 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2011 08:07 AM, Upendra Moturi wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> The patch it appears still has problem.
>> I have changed only mtu value as 2kb instead of burst value in the
>> network.c file
>>
>> With average as 2048 , burst as 2048 and peak 2048
>> scp copied at 30-40KB/s
>
> All test I did were with the patch applied. I saw the throughput
> collapsing yesterday at 2Mb mtu.
Let me clarify : Yesterday I saw the throughput collapse without the patch
applied.
Stefan
>
> I generated a file using
>
> dd if=/dev/urandom of=testfile bs=1024 count=409600
>
> I did the same test you did with 2048 without specifying a specific model
> of ethernet card and reach 1.9MB/s using scp'ing towards remote machine.
> When specifying <model type='virtio'/> I also get 1.9MB/s as result.
>>
>> With average as 4096 , burst as 4096 and peak 4096
>> scp copied at same 30-40KB/s
>>
> With these numbers and using the virtio model I ended up getting a
> throughput of 3.8Mb/s.
>
> The host is a 3.0.0 Linux kernel. Here's the command line output of the tc
> command inspecting the tap interface of the VM (vnet0).
>
> # tc filter show dev vnet0 root
> filter parent ffff: protocol ip pref 49152 u32
> filter parent ffff: protocol ip pref 49152 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1
> filter parent ffff: protocol ip pref 49152 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key
> ht 800 bkt 0 flowid :1
> match 00000000/00000000 at 12
> police 0x5b rate 32768Kbit burst 4Mb mtu 2Kb action drop overhead 0b
> ref 1 bind 1
>
>
> Maybe someone else can verify as well.
>
> Stefan
>
>> where as earlier it was 1 MB/s.(without patch)
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Stefan Berger
>> <stefanb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/10/2011 11:20 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/10/2011 09:04 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 08/10/2011 02:55 AM, Upendra Moturi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> does this patch solve your problem? I am setting the MTU to fixed
2kb.
>>>>> Doing tests with scp seems to indicate that this improved the
>>>>> situation
>>>>> -- at least for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stefan
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger<stefanb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> src/util/network.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Index: libvirt-acl/src/util/network.c
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> --- libvirt-acl.orig/src/util/network.c
>>>>> +++ libvirt-acl/src/util/network.c
>>>>> @@ -1156,8 +1156,8 @@ virBandwidthEnable(virBandwidthPtr bandw
>>>>>
>>>>> virCommandFree(cmd);
>>>>> cmd = virCommandNew(TC);
>>>>> - virCommandAddArgList(cmd,"class", "add",
"dev", iface, "parent",
>>>>> - "1:", "classid", "1:1",
"htb", NULL);
>>>>> + virCommandAddArgList(cmd,"class", "add",
"dev", iface, "parent",
>>>>> + "1:", "classid", "1:1",
"htb", NULL);
>>>>> virCommandAddArgList(cmd, "rate", average, NULL);
>>>>
>>>> This hunk was just indentation; you should push the whitespace changes
>>>> as
>>>> a separate commit (and can push that now, under the trivial rule,
>>>> without
>>>> needing further review). [It doesn't help matters that thunderbird
>>>> botched
>>>> the whitespace in my reply]
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -1202,7 +1202,7 @@ virBandwidthEnable(virBandwidthPtr bandw
>>>>> virCommandAddArgList(cmd, "filter", "add",
"dev", iface, "parent",
>>>>> "ffff:", "protocol", "ip",
"u32", "match", "ip",
>>>>> "src", "0.0.0.0/0", "police",
"rate", average,
>>>>> - "burst", burst, "mtu", burst, "drop",
"flowid",
>>>>> + "burst", burst, "mtu", "2kb",
"drop", "flowid",
>>>>> ":1", NULL);
>>>>
>>>> Here's the meat of the proposed patch. Is 2kb always valid, or will
we
>>>> run into problems on NICs that insist on traditional limits near the
>>>> 1518
>>>> mark? Should it be user-configurable? I'm reluctant to ACK this
>>>> without a
>>>> bit more understanding of why 2kb works, as well as feedback on test
>>>> results
>>>> with the patch in place.
>>>>
>>> Yes, I am not an exper on tc. I have seen examples with the mtu being
>>> set to
>>> '1' for dropping icmp traffic for example. So if a VM produces
smaller
>>> than
>>> 2kb packets, which on traditional networks it probably should, then the
>>> packets should go through. We could also leave out the mtu parameter
>>> above
>>> and it would go to 2kb by default. Check via
>>>
>>> tc filter show dev<ifname> root
>>>
>>> The 2kb parameter doesn't explain why 2MB doesn't work, though.
>>> Even if this wasn't the final fix, it at least 'improves the
situation'
>>> (for
>>> me).
>>>
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list