Re: [libvirt] Network device abstraction aka virtual switch - V3
On 06/12/2011 08:29 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
* Does anyone have better names for "brctl-bridge" and
"macvtap-bridge"?
How about using "direct" instead of macvtap-bridge, and
"direct-private", "direct-vepa", and "direct-passthrough"
for "private",
"vepa", and "passthrough"?
I still can't think of anything more generally useful instead of
brctl-bridge...