On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 13:50:19 -0400, Collin Walling wrote:
Sorry for the delay. I've been experiencing issues with the mail
server :(
On 05/16/2018 04:39 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> index 6c086b9ef8..4b48afdad1 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> @@ -13100,6 +13100,65 @@ qemuConnectCompareCPU(virConnectPtr conn,
> }
>
>
> +static int
> +qemuConnectCompareHypervisorCPU(virConnectPtr conn,
> + const char *emulator,
> + const char *archStr,
> + const char *machine,
> + const char *virttypeStr,
> + const char *xmlCPU,
> + unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + int ret = VIR_CPU_COMPARE_ERROR;
> + virQEMUDriverPtr driver = conn->privateData;
> + virQEMUCapsPtr qemuCaps = NULL;
> + bool failIncompatible;
> + virCPUDefPtr hvCPU;
> + virArch arch;
> + virDomainVirtType virttype;
> +
> + virCheckFlags(VIR_CONNECT_COMPARE_CPU_FAIL_INCOMPATIBLE,
> + VIR_CPU_COMPARE_ERROR);
> +
> + if (virConnectCompareHypervisorCPUEnsureACL(conn) < 0)
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + failIncompatible = !!(flags & VIR_CONNECT_COMPARE_CPU_FAIL_INCOMPATIBLE);
> +
> + qemuCaps = virQEMUCapsCacheLookupDefault(driver->qemuCapsCache,
> + emulator,
> + archStr,
> + virttypeStr,
> + machine,
> + &arch, &virttype, NULL);
> + if (!qemuCaps)
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + hvCPU = virQEMUCapsGetHostModel(qemuCaps, virttype,
> + VIR_QEMU_CAPS_HOST_CPU_REPORTED);
nit: add a blank line here
> + if (!hvCPU || hvCPU->fallback != VIR_CPU_FALLBACK_FORBID) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_UNSUPPORTED,
> + _("QEMU '%s' does not support reporting CPU
model for "
> + "virttype '%s'"),
> + virQEMUCapsGetBinary(qemuCaps),
> + virDomainVirtTypeToString(virttype));
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> + if (ARCH_IS_X86(arch)) {
> + ret = virCPUCompareXML(arch, hvCPU, xmlCPU, failIncompatible);
> + } else {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_UNSUPPORTED,
> + _("comparing hypervisor CPUs is not supported for
"
> + "arch %s"), virArchToString(arch));
At first glance, this message makes me think that this function is for "comparing
two hypervisor CPUs".
Perhaps the message should say "comparing with the hypervisor CPU is not supported
for arch %s" instead?
I think that makes it more clear that the other CPU in question is not (necessarily) a
hypervisor CPU.
Yeah, that's definitely better.
Jirka