-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Il 21/08/2013 19:10, Eric Blake ha scritto:
On 08/21/2013 10:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> eg it is valid to have <on_crash> present in the XML at all
>> times, even if there's no pvpanic device present. That simply
>> means the actions will never be triggered.
>
> So are you suggesting to add a <pvpanic/> element to <devices>?
> That may be fine, but it doesn't seem very user-friendly.
No less friendly than having a <memballoon> device, and certainly
automatable via libosinfo integration into virt-install.
Fair enough. Still I'm not sure that a new <on_panic> element should
be ruled out, see my other message.
Paolo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/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=jYpU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----