Chris Lalancette wrote:
...
>> commit 4d3b7e06bc8e2e76584da369406df0909c63f2d4
>> Author: Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>
>> Date: Tue Mar 9 09:33:48 2010 -0700
>>
>> build: consistently indent preprocessor directives
>>
>> * global: patch created by running:
>> for f in $(git ls-files '*.[ch]') ; do
>> cppi $f > $f.t && mv $f.t $f
>> done
>
> I'll go ahead and push this if no one speaks up soon.
> Rather than downloading and applying the patch, I ran the command
> and committed as you.
By "this", you mean patch 1/2, correct? I just want to make sure
Yes. The one induced by the for loop command,
and whose header I quoted.
we don't make syntax-check dependent on a non-existent
cppi package until we have a fallback plan. (My automated build
testing does "make syntax-check", and I don't want it to fail
every night now because cppi is not packaged)
I wouldn't push the enforcement patch until I'm sure
it will pass (or skip) for everyone.