Re: [Libvir] The problem of the definition of tuning informations
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 04:31:49PM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:34:05PM -0500, beth kon wrote:
> Just to be sure I understand, are you suggesting removing tuning
> information from any configuration file and making it a runtime exercise
> to set it up? (That is, after the domain has been started)
It would not be removing, as I don't think we have any at this point,
the only exception would be the 'currentMemory' parameter, and the cpuset
informations, both are optional obviously, but may be absolutely necessary
at creation time, to avoid a broken or failed setup of the domain.
Hum, I'm afraid I may have been unclear there, currentMemory and cpuset
aren't really tuning parameters and need to be stay in the XML config.
They are just 2 inforamtions which are on the edge.
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/