On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:58:25PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:31:07AM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
On 03/10/2011 07:12 AM, Lyre wrote:
The spec was copied from Radek's original php-libvirt with the License untouched, I'm not sure about it.
Ok Lyre, then I guess Radek wanted to stick with the PHP licence. However by naming it php-libvirt he was violating the licence because of following paragraph:
Can we check with Radek if it's okay to switch to LGPLv2 ?
I assume you actually mean LGPLv2+ (ie the or-later variety)
That would be simpler and more in line with libvirt licencing itself,
Radek, Lyre, would you agree with such a change ?
Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|