Re: [Libvir] CPU pinning of domains at creation time

On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:53:17 -0400 Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 10:45:44AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: > > I think we should support the same cpuset notation that Xen supports, > > which means including ranges (1-4) and negation (^1). These two > > features make describing large ranges much more compact. > > Enclosed is a rewrite of the cpuset notations, which can plug as > a replacement for the current code in xend_internals, it should support > the existing syntax currently used to parse xend topology strings, > and also alllow ranges and negation. It's not as a patch but as a > standlone replacement program which can be used to test (in spirit > of the old topology.c one from Beth). > I guess that's okay, check the test output (and possibly extend the > test cases in tests array), It tried to think of everything including > the weird \\n python xend bug and the 'no cpus' in cell cases. > Just dump tst.c in libvirt/src, add $(INCLUDES) to the > $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -I../include -o tst tst.c .... line and run > make tst > ./tst > and check the output (also enclosed), > The parsing is done in a slightly different way, but that should > not change the output, I checked the test output. It seems work fine to me ! And also, how about this one for specifying "all" as an input ?