On 04/26/2012 02:11 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 04/26/2012 03:50 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816662 pointed out
> that attempting 'virsh blockpull' on an offline domain gave a
> misleading error message about qemu lacking support for the
> operation, even when qemu was specifically updated to support it.
> The real problem is that we have several capabilities that are
> only determined when starting a domain, and therefore are still
> clear when first working with an inactive domain (namely, any
> capability set by qemuMonitorJSONCheckCommands).
> @@ -12637,6 +12643,12 @@
qemuDomainPMSuspendForDuration(virDomainPtr dom,
>
> priv = vm->privateData;
>
> + if (!virDomainObjIsActive(vm)) {
> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID,
> + "%s", _("domain is not running"));
> + goto endjob;
> + }
> +
Nit, you could move this above the priv =. Neither endjob nor cleanup
need this priv.
But 'goto endjob' is wrong (replace with 'goto cleanup'),
D'oh - too much copy-and-paste! You're obviously right (and this is why
we do code review).
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org