On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 05:40:38PM +0400, marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com wrote:
From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com>
We may want to check qemu-rdp presence, instead of failing later?
Yes, we should validate qemu-rdp, because the capabilities get
advertized to client apps in domain capabilities, as well as
being the thing that checks XML configs in qemuDomainValidate.
So if qemu-rdp is missing, we must not claim the capabilty.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com>
---
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 7 +++++--
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_10.0.0.s390x.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_7.0.0-q35.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_7.0.0-tcg.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_7.0.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_7.1.0-q35.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_7.1.0-tcg.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_7.1.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_7.2.0-hvf.x86_64+hvf.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_7.2.0-q35.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_7.2.0-tcg.x86_64+hvf.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_7.2.0-tcg.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_7.2.0.ppc.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_7.2.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.0.0-q35.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.0.0-tcg.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.0.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.1.0-q35.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.1.0-tcg.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.1.0.s390x.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.1.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.2.0-q35.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.2.0-tcg-virt.loongarch64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.2.0-tcg.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.2.0-virt.aarch64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.2.0-virt.loongarch64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.2.0.aarch64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.2.0.armv7l.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.2.0.s390x.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_8.2.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.0.0-q35.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.0.0-tcg.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.0.0.sparc.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.0.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.1.0-q35.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.1.0-tcg-virt.riscv64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.1.0-tcg.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.1.0-virt.riscv64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.1.0.s390x.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.1.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.2.0-q35.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.2.0-tcg.x86_64.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.2.0.s390x.xml | 1 +
tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.2.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
44 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
index 490f5b28fd..43669aa27d 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
@@ -6497,8 +6497,11 @@ virQEMUCapsFillDomainDeviceGraphicsCaps(virQEMUCaps *qemuCaps,
VIR_DOMAIN_CAPS_ENUM_SET(dev->type, VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_SPICE);
if (virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_EGL_HEADLESS))
VIR_DOMAIN_CAPS_ENUM_SET(dev->type, VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_EGL_HEADLESS);
- if (virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DISPLAY_DBUS))
- VIR_DOMAIN_CAPS_ENUM_SET(dev->type, VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_DBUS);
+ if (virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DISPLAY_DBUS)) {
+ VIR_DOMAIN_CAPS_ENUM_SET(dev->type,
+ VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_DBUS,
+ VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_RDP);
+ }
}
With regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|