On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:34:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:20:54AM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
> New patch below, with changes discussed (removal of --without devel)
That patch underwent some line wrapping when you put it into the mail.
It's much better to send patches as attachments. Here is the
I'm fine with inline patches, provided they're sent from a mail client
which doesn't mangle whitespace.
This doc has details on how to make Thunderbird not suck.
http://lwn.net/Articles/249669/
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|