On 11/28/2011 11:26 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/28/2011 10:46 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>> + /* Check if the host supports the requested suspend state */
>>> + switch (state) {
>>> + case VIR_NODE_S3:
>>> + if (hostPMFeatures & VIR_NODE_S3) {
>>> + cmdString = strdup("pm-suspend");
>>> + if (cmdString == NULL) {
>>> + virReportOOMError();
>>> + goto cleanup;
>>> + }
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + goto cleanup;
>>
>> Needs to report an error, VIR_ERR_OPERATION_UNSUPPORTED
>>
>
>
> Ok, then I will define VIR_ERR_OPERATION_UNSUPPORTED in
> src/util/virterror.c and use it, since it is not there at
> present. And that definition should be in a separate,
> self-contained patch right?
Hmm, I think that was probably just a case of Daniel typing by memory
instead of checking the source, and evidence of how confusing our
existing error naming is. Just use the existing
VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID instead of inventing a new error.
Ok thanks, will do that.
--
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
IBM Linux Technology Center