Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/6] Improvements to CPU frequency reporting
On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 12:52 +0100, Bjoern Walk wrote:
Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com> [2017-12-11, 05:40PM
+0100]:
> A few steps towards eventually fixing
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206353
>
> The commit message for patch 6/6 contains most of the rationale,
> previous patches are cleanups. If not for the new test case added
> with patch 1/6, the overall diffstat would be negative.
The timings... I have a similar patch set in my queue that I wanted to
send out today, but, well. I also have fixed frequency reporting on
S390, which I will at least rebase on top of this.
I'm sorry! Some amount of duplicated work is kind of unavoidable
in a loosely-organized community project such as libvirt.
Hopefully rebasing on top of my series is not too much work,
considering most of it is just refactoring and cleanups.
Before you push, I want to review this series and compare it with
mine,
but I can't make it today I'm afraid. I will find the time to do it
tomorrow.
I'd certainly appreciate that. The series doesn't have any ACKs
yet, so there's no risk I'd push it before you can get to it :)
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization