[libvirt] [PATCH v2 0/3] Use non-blacklisted family/model/stepping for Haswell CPU model

Changes v1 -> v2: * Coding style fixes * Make series simpler: * Don't use trick: char vendor[static (CPUID_VENDOR_SZ + 1)] because it confuses checkpatch.pl * Removed patch "Add explicit array size to x86_cpu_vendor_words2str()" * Rebased on top of my x86-next branch: https://github.com/ehabkost/qemu x86-next Git branch for testing: https://github.com/ehabkost/qemu-hacks work/x86-rtm-blacklist Diff from v1: diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h index cd94726e43..647435a1d9 100644 --- a/target/i386/cpu.h +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h @@ -1431,7 +1431,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count, void cpu_clear_apic_feature(CPUX86State *env); void host_cpuid(uint32_t function, uint32_t count, uint32_t *eax, uint32_t *ebx, uint32_t *ecx, uint32_t *edx); -void host_vendor_fms(char vendor[static (CPUID_VENDOR_SZ + 1)], int *family, int *model, int *stepping); +void host_vendor_fms(char *vendor, int *family, int *model, int *stepping); /* helper.c */ int x86_cpu_handle_mmu_fault(CPUState *cpu, vaddr addr, diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c index 25c6c5e115..eab1ad7935 100644 --- a/target/i386/cpu.c +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ void host_cpuid(uint32_t function, uint32_t count, *edx = vec[3]; } -void host_vendor_fms(char vendor[static (CPUID_VENDOR_SZ + 1)], int *family, int *model, int *stepping) +void host_vendor_fms(char *vendor, int *family, int *model, int *stepping) { uint32_t eax, ebx, ecx, edx; @@ -1570,7 +1570,8 @@ static void host_x86_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) xcc->kvm_required = true; xcc->ordering = 9; - host_vendor_fms(host_cpudef.vendor, &host_cpudef.family, &host_cpudef.model, &host_cpudef.stepping); + host_vendor_fms(host_cpudef.vendor, &host_cpudef.family, + &host_cpudef.model, &host_cpudef.stepping); cpu_x86_fill_model_id(host_cpudef.model_id); --- A recent glibc commit[1] added a blacklist to ensure it won't use TSX on hosts that are known to have a broken TSX implementation. Our existing Haswell CPU model has a blacklisted family/model/stepping combination, so it has to be updated to make sure guests will really use TSX. This is done by patch 5/5. However, to do this safely we need to ensure the host CPU is not a blacklisted one, so we won't mislead guests by exposing known-to-be-good FMS values on a known-to-be-broken host. This is done by patch 3/5. [1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=2702856bf45c82cf8e69f2... --- Cc: dgilbert(a)redhat.com Cc: fweimer(a)redhat.com Cc: carlos(a)redhat.com Cc: triegel(a)redhat.com Cc: berrange(a)redhat.com Cc: jdenemar(a)redhat.com Cc: pbonzini(a)redhat.com Eduardo Habkost (3): i386: host_vendor_fms() helper function i386/kvm: Blacklist TSX on known broken hosts i386: Change stepping of Haswell to non-blacklisted value include/hw/i386/pc.h | 5 +++++ target/i386/cpu.h | 1 + target/i386/cpu.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------- target/i386/kvm.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.11.0.259.g40922b1