On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 08:29:56PM +0530, Prerna Saxena wrote:
From: Prerna Saxena <prerna(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:01:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] Add support for ppc64 qemu
This enables libvirt to select the correct qemu binary (qemu-system-ppc64)
for a guest vm based on arch 'ppc64'.
Also, libvirt is enabled to correctly parse the list of supported PowerPC
CPUs, generated by running 'qemu-system-ppc64 -cpu ?'
Signed-off-by: Prerna Saxena <prerna(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
index c5fe41d..c2d3d93 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static const struct qemu_arch_info const arch_info_hvm[] = {
{ "mipsel", 32, NULL, "qemu-system-mipsel", NULL, NULL, 0 },
{ "sparc", 32, NULL, "qemu-system-sparc", NULL, NULL, 0 },
{ "ppc", 32, NULL, "qemu-system-ppc", NULL, NULL, 0 },
+ { "ppc64", 64, NULL, "qemu-system-ppc64", NULL, NULL, 0
},
{ "itanium", 64, NULL, "qemu-system-ia64", NULL, NULL, 0 },
{ "s390x", 64, NULL, "qemu-system-s390x", NULL, NULL, 0 },
};
@@ -477,6 +478,67 @@ error:
return -1;
}
+/* ppc64 parser.
+ * Format : PowerPC <machine> <description>
+ */
+static int
+qemuCapsParsePPCModels(const char *output,
+ unsigned int *retcount,
+ const char ***retcpus)
+{
+ const char *p = output;
+ const char *next;
+ unsigned int count = 0;
+ const char **cpus = NULL;
+ int i;
+ do {
+ const char *t;
+
+ if ((next = strchr(p, '\n')))
+ next++;
+
+ if (!STRPREFIX(p, "PowerPC "))
+ continue;
+
+ /* Skip the preceding sub-string "PowerPC " */
+ p += 8;
+
+ /*Malformed string, does not obey the format 'PowerPC <model>
<desc>'*/
+ if (!(t = strchr(p, ' ')) || (next && t >= next))
+ continue;
+
+ if (*p == '\0' || *p == '\n')
+ continue;
+
+ if (retcpus) {
+ unsigned int len;
+
+ if (VIR_REALLOC_N(cpus, count + 1) < 0)
+ goto error;
Need a virReportOOMError() call here
+
+ if (t)
+ len = t - p - 1;
+
+ if (!(cpus[count] = strndup(p, len)))
+ goto error;
Need a virReportOOMError() call here too
+ }
+ count++;
+ } while ((p = next));
+
+ if (retcount)
+ *retcount = count;
+ if (retcpus)
+ *retcpus = cpus;
+ return 0;
+
+error:
+ if (cpus) {
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
+ VIR_FREE(cpus[i]);
+ }
+ VIR_FREE(cpus);
+ return -1;
+}
int
qemuCapsProbeCPUModels(const char *qemu,
@@ -497,6 +559,8 @@ qemuCapsProbeCPUModels(const char *qemu,
if (STREQ(arch, "i686") || STREQ(arch, "x86_64"))
parse = qemuCapsParseX86Models;
+ else if (STREQ(arch, "ppc64"))
+ parse = qemuCapsParsePPCModels;
else {
VIR_DEBUG("don't know how to parse %s CPU models", arch);
return 0;
I know we don't have any test case for the x86 CPU parser here either,
but it would be desirable to create a test case for the PPC parser
while doing this. eg, save the QEMU -cpu? output into a text file
in the tests/ directory, and invoke qemuCapsParsePPCModels() on it
and validate the result.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|