2 Jan
2017
2 Jan
'17
9:57 a.m.
On Sun, 2017-01-01 at 12:35 +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
No rush, I see Michal has yet another proposal for this that we haven't considered and even though there are somedrawbacks to that as well, it looks nicer than this. After all the ideas I'm starting to like the "gross" one the best. Oh my =) My vote still goes to this solution, because having a placeholder seems more explicit and easier to follow than doing s/lo/lo0/ directly.
I vote for Michal's approach as it doesn't require us to disable VIR_TEST_REGENERATE_OUTPUT. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization