Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 03/16] docs: hacking: emphasize some sections

Namely: * holding up the first-time patch submissions for moderation, which might cause first-time submitters to question the process * not CC-ing individual developers Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com&gt; --- docs/hacking.html.in | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/hacking.html.in b/docs/hacking.html.in index 42c8596abe..71a6ccc18b 100644 --- a/docs/hacking.html.in +++ b/docs/hacking.html.in @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ </pre> <p>As a rule, patches should be sent to the mailing list only: all developers are subscribed to libvir-list and read it regularly, so - please don't CC individual developers unless they've explicitly - asked you to.</p> + <strong>please don't CC individual developers</strong> unless + they've explicitly asked you to.</p> <p>Avoid using mail clients for sending patches, as most of them will mangle the messages in some way, making them unusable for our purposes. Gmail and other Web-based mail clients are particularly @@ -81,9 +81,10 @@ <p>If everything went well, your patch should show up on the <a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/">libvir-list archives</a> in a matter of minutes; if you still can't find it on - there after an hour or so, you should double-check your setup. Note - that your very first post to the mailing list will be subject to - moderation, and it's not uncommon for that to take around a day.</p> + there after an hour or so, you should double-check your setup. + <strong>Note that your very first post to the mailing list will be + subject to moderation</strong>, and it's not uncommon for that to + take around a day.</p>

<p>Please follow this as close as you can, especially the rebase and <code>git send-email</code> part, as it makes life easier for other developers to review your patch set.</p>