19 Aug
2019
19 Aug
'19
4:15 p.m.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 04:35:37PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
The fact that we're removing a pool object from the list of pools doesn't mean we want to unlock it. It violates locking policy too as object locking and unlocking is not done on the same level.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> --- src/conf/virstorageobj.c | 5 ++--- src/storage/storage_driver.c | 17 +++-------------- src/test/test_driver.c | 14 +++----------- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com> Jano