19 Jan
2008
19 Jan
'08
5:08 a.m.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:51:56PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:25:44PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
S.Sakamoto wrote:
These struct definitions *intentionally* private. Oops, I did not notice it...
I revised a patch not to access the struct data directly.
In principle this patch looks good. If no one else objects, I'll commit this, with a few of my own fixes (below).
Yep, fine by me.
Dunno yet if it was commited, in any case +1, Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/