On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:08:33AM -0400, Guido Günther wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:05:56AM -0500, Charles Duffy wrote:
> It appears that this patch was applied (in commit
> 45616162db2d1e807dbe70e60c67cb701cbd06d8) with the virDomainIsActive(vm)
> checks removed from qemudDomainCreate, such that we fail out with
> "domain [...] is already defined and running" even if the domain is only
> defined but not running.
The error message is confusing. I missed to correct that. Shall I send a
patch? I thing doing more than that is simply too confusing for users.
No, no problem, Charles was being confused :-) all set now !
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group
http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/