Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] Xen: Support cpu_weight and cpu_cap for Xen.

David Lutterkort wrote: > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 09:08 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > >> I can understand the need to make it easy for an user, I still don't >> think this means those tuning informations need to be associated to the >> domain definition, to me it is somehow orthogonal to the domain >> themselves >> and I would rather try to provide a good solution to the problem, than >> try to imitate how Xen was doing that. >> > > > Surely, users who set tuning parameters view them as part of their > domain description. I agree. It appears the discussions around recent Linux-VServer patches includes tuning information in the XML description so I'm a little confused if this idea is being received positively or not. I would like to avoid calling out to some other API for scheduling parameters at domU definition if at all possible. Perhaps I've been away too long and this functionality already exists :-), but not seeing it in http://www.libvirt.org/format.html Regards, Jim -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list