On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:45:16AM +0200, Wojtek Porczyk wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:14:24PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 05:54:04PM +0200, Wojtek Porczyk wrote:
> > Hi libvirt-list,
> >
> > I'd like to submit a second iteration of libvirtaio series for 3.8.0.
> > There are some improvements to have better control over closing
> > connections, which are important in test suites which repeatedly open
> > and close connections. Also there are some minor bugfixes and better
> > logging.
>
> There's something strange in this posting - the patches I received are all
> missing 'libvir-list(a)redhat.com' in the To: field - its almost like this
> was Bcc'd to the list which means anyone replying doesn't copy the list
> address on their reply. Even more odd though, I got a second copy of
> patch 3 which does have the To field set.
I'm sorry, this was my fault. I sent the whole series by [b]ouncing this in
mutt, because it otherwise mangles Message-Id and In-Reply-To: fields. The
previous posting of this series has this problem. I did it two times, since
there was a delay in delivery (I don't know why, maybe greylisting) and
I worried that the first batch was rejected for the lack of To: field, which
I forgot at the time of git format-patch.
The delay wasn't anything you did - the mail server was having significant
delays processing mail at the latter half of last week, and thus randomly
delaying stuff for people.
FWIW, if possible with your local network/mail setup, for sending patches
we recommend using 'git send-email' rather than doing it from a mail client
since it gets threading right automagically.
Anyway I've pushed this series to git master, so thanks for your continued
contributions :-)
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|