On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 17:59:21 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
...
> @@ -1127,9 +1127,13 @@ cmdCPUModelNames(vshControl *ctl, const
vshCmd *cmd)
> return false;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < nmodels; i++) {
> - vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", models[i]);
> - VIR_FREE(models[i]);
> + if (nmodels == 0) {
> + vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", _("all CPU models are
accepted"));
> + } else {
> + for (i = 0; i < nmodels; i++) {
> + vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", models[i]);
> + VIR_FREE(models[i]);
> + }
I seem to recall some recent work around the -q[uiet] switch - is that
something that this code needs to be concerned with? (as silly as that
seems while I'm typing it!)
Not silly at all. I replaced vshPrint with vshPrintExtra.
Jirka