
14 Sep
2016
14 Sep
'16
9:17 a.m.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 17:59:21 -0400, John Ferlan wrote: ...
@@ -1127,9 +1127,13 @@ cmdCPUModelNames(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd) return false; }
- for (i = 0; i < nmodels; i++) { - vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", models[i]); - VIR_FREE(models[i]); + if (nmodels == 0) { + vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", _("all CPU models are accepted")); + } else { + for (i = 0; i < nmodels; i++) { + vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", models[i]); + VIR_FREE(models[i]); + }
I seem to recall some recent work around the -q[uiet] switch - is that something that this code needs to be concerned with? (as silly as that seems while I'm typing it!)
Not silly at all. I replaced vshPrint with vshPrintExtra. Jirka