On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:08:46PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 07:12:08PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> Create qemu monitor events as a distinct class to normal domain
> events, because they will be filtered differently. For ease of
> review, the logic for filtering by event name is saved for a later
> patch.
>
> * src/conf/domain_event.c (virDomainQemuMonitorEventClass): New
> class.
> (virDomainEventsOnceInit): Register it.
> (virDomainQemuMonitorEventDispose, virDomainQemuMonitorEventNew)
> (virDomainQemuMonitorEventDispatchFunc)
> (virDomainQemuMonitorEventStateRegisterID): New functions.
> * src/conf/domain_event.h (virDomainQemuMonitorEventNew)
> (virDomainQemuMonitorEventStateRegisterID): New prototypes.
> * src/libvirt_private.syms (conf/domain_conf.h): Export them.
> ---
> src/conf/domain_event.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> src/conf/domain_event.h | 22 ++++++++
> src/libvirt_private.syms | 2 +
> 3 files changed, 164 insertions(+)
I think these APIs should be in src/qemu/qemu_event.{c,h} rather
than in the shared codebase. I think it ought to be possible to
split the code off, since we've already done separation of the
network + domain events + base object evemt classes into distinct
files.
Ah, later patches show why this is needed - the remote client driver
needs access to this API
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|