On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:09:59AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:40:24PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/07/2014 02:02 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
> > When building packages in a clean chroot the QEMU_USER and QEMU_GROUP
> > don't exist making VirQemuDriverConfigNew fail with privileged=true.
> >
> > Avoid that by not requiring priviliged mode and skipping tests that need
>
> s/priviliged/privileged/
>
> > it.
> > ---
> > tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Seems like this is what avoids the fail pointed out in 1/3. It still
> feels fishy that our testsuite is that dependent on the system (ideally,
> we'd provide a way to mock things up so that creating the config file
> NEVER fails when run from the testsuite, even if the uid doesn't exist -
> because we shouldn't be probing the live system, only our mockups). I'd
> wait for a second opinion on whether this patch is papering over a
> bigger problem of depending on the current system state, or whether it
> is an acceptable way to avoid the issue without investing the effort to
> tackle at the uid lookup level.
IMHO we should be passing privileged == false unconditionally, so that
we always skip any magic username lookups.
I would have done that but Martin's 29151830e468f1a9d8006a62702591958a4e3481
did the opposite, so o.k. to revert that?
Cheers,
-- Guido