On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:34:36PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
>>We already are checking for negative value, reporting an error, but
>>using wrong function, so the check never succeeds. This patch provides
>
>Actually it could succeed, for example with queues="asdf" or "3d"
it
>would return a -1. So I reworded it a bit.
>
>>just a minor change in call of the right version of function virStrToLong.
>>
>>Resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138539
>>---
>> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>>index a2a7d92..42b8973 100644
>>--- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>>+++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>>@@ -7374,7 +7374,7 @@ virDomainNetDefParseXML(virDomainXMLOptionPtr xmlopt,
>> }
>> if (queues) {
>> unsigned int q;
>>- if (virStrToLong_ui(queues, NULL, 10, &q) < 0) {
>>+ if (virStrToLong_uip(queues, NULL, 10, &q) < 0) {
>> virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_DETAIL,
>> _("'queues' attribute must be
positive number: %s"),
>> queues);
>>--
>>1.9.3
>>
>
>ACK && Pushed,
>
Well, I should've said that having a test for that can show that it
works properly. It should be named *-invalid.xml and that will make
schema tests check whether the RNG schema fits as well. That would be
a great follow-up! ;-)
Sorry for spamming, but I just realized that I haven't pushed it yet,
so I'm reverting my ACK and please add the tests and make sure that
RNG schema fits.
Thanks,
Martin