According to Jim Meyering on 3/3/2010 2:03 AM:
Eric Blake wrote:
> gcc warns:
> virsh.c:1879: warning: '0' flag ignored with '-' flag in gnu_printf
format
Odd... I don't get that warning on F12 or rawhide.
Which version of gcc are you using?
Any added options, beyond those provided by this:
./autogen.sh --enable-compile-warnings=maximum
Huh - I had to go back and see what breadcrumbs show for how I had
configured. I'm using F12, gcc 4.4.3, and ./config.status --version reports:
configured by ./configure, generated by GNU Autoconf 2.63,
with options "'CFLAGS=-Wall' '-C'"
Apparently, in this build tree, I _didn't_ use --enable-compile-warnings,
but had manually set CFLAGS myself to a subset of warnings (note to self -
next time I bootstrap, I should use the configure option rather than
trying to do it by hand). So is there something in plain -Wall that
accidently gets turned back off by --enable-compile-warnings=maximum?
Meanwhile, it would be nice to add -fdiagnostics-show-option to the set of
warning flags attempted by --enable-compile-warnings. That would have
told us which particular reason I got the warning. Or perhaps even use
the gnulib module manywarnings, rather than hand-rolling
LIBVIRT_COMPILE_WARNINGS, so that we pick up benefits from gnulib folks
whenever better approaches for enabling warnings are implemented. I'll
start a patch series along those lines (post 0.7.7).
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org