On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 13:19:55 +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
Convenience function to return the value of an enum XML attribute.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh(a)redhat.com>
---
src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
src/util/virxml.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/util/virxml.h | 5 ++++
3 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
[...]
diff --git a/src/util/virxml.c b/src/util/virxml.c
index fba02900f5..8147266557 100644
--- a/src/util/virxml.c
+++ b/src/util/virxml.c
@@ -774,6 +774,57 @@ virXMLPropUInt(xmlNodePtr node, const char* name, int base,
}
+/**
+ * virXMLPropEnum:
+ * @node: XML dom node pointer
+ * @name: Name of the property (attribute) to get
+ * @strToInt: Conversion function to turn enum name to value. Expected to
+ * return negative value on failure.
+ * @flags: Bitwise or of virXMLPropFlags
+ * @result: The returned value
+ *
+ * Convenience function to return value of an enum attribute.
+ *
+ * Returns 1 in case of success in which case @result is set,
+ * or 0 if the attribute is not present,
+ * or -1 and reports an error on failure.
+ */
+int
+virXMLPropEnum(xmlNodePtr node, const char* name, int (*strToInt)(const char*),
+ virXMLPropFlags flags, unsigned int *result)
+{
+ g_autofree char *tmp = NULL;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!node || !name || !strToInt || !result) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
+ _("Invalid argument to %s"),
+ __FUNCTION__);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (!(tmp = virXMLPropString(node, name))) {
+ if ((flags & VIR_XML_PROP_REQUIRED) != VIR_XML_PROP_REQUIRED)
+ return 0;
+
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR,
+ _("Missing required attribute '%s' in element
'%s'"),
+ name, node->name);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ ret = strToInt(tmp);
+ if ((ret < 0) || ((flags & VIR_XML_PROP_NONZERO) && (ret == 0))) {
The parentheses in this condition make it confusing to read. I suggest
if (ret < 0 ||
((flags & VIR_XML_PROP_NONZERO) && (ret == 0))) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR,
+ _("Invalid value for attribute '%s' in element
'%s': '%s'."),
+ name, node->name, NULLSTR(tmp));
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ *result = ret;
+ return 0;
+}
Obviously relevant comments from previous patches apply too:
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com>