Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 17 December 2009, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 07:48:08PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>
>> The more interesting invocation of vhost-net though is one where the
>> vhost-net device backs directly to a physical network card. In this
>> mode, vhost should get considerably better performance than the current
>> implementation. I don't know the syntax yet, but I think it's
>> reasonable to assume that it will look something like -net
>> tap,dev=eth0. The effect will be that eth0 is dedicated to the guest.
>>
> Ok, so in this model you have to create a dedicated ethXX device for
> every guest, no sharing ?
>
I think so, but it could be any of
* a physical NIC dedicated to the guest, e.g. if you want to run a firewall
on that guest and provide connectivity to all other guests to that, or if
you have lots of real NICs
* an IOV adapter with separate physical or virtual functions
* a VMDq adapter that shows multiple queues on the same PCI function
as separate network interfaces
* a macvlan device in VEPA or bridge mode
I don't think a macvlan device is quite the same thing (mainly because
there is not finite number of them). I think <source vepa="on"
dev="eth0"/> probably would make more sense as a UI.
But then libvirt needs to be able to create/destroy macvlan devices on
demand.
---
Regards,
Anthony Liguori