Re: [libvirt] Proposal: no dnsmasq (no dhcp and no dns) and no radvd option
On 11/26/2012 10:40 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I understand that you can define multiple IPv4 and multiple IPv6
gateway addresses on a network interface but only one IPv4 DHCP and
one IPv6 DHCP. I can see the need for both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols on
a single network "fabric" but I am not sure how many real network
"fabrics" have multiple subnetworks on them. Yes, it could be done
but I am not certain why you would do that (and I am also sure that
someone has a very valid reason for doing that).
Oops! There may be a problem
here with radvd!.
I have difficulty in understanding why one would define multiple IPv6
(or even IPv4) subnetworks on a single interface. Well, I guess the
radvd authors did also: the AdvManagedFlag on/off applies to the entire
interface and no a specific network.
I am verifying this but there is a chance that dsnmasq could support
both for different subnetworks.
I guess that dnsmasq could be used to support one and radvd used to
support the other but ???
I believe this may need more discussion from others. I would like to
have someone other than the two of us chime in on this.
Gene