Hi, Daniel
Thank you for you information
It would be helpful.
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
Daniel Veillard <veillard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:36:01PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> Hi, Dan
>
> Thank you for comment.
> Shigeki does not repond this issue at this moment.
> I will comment on this instead.
> He should respond this issue quickly!
>
> In his survey,
> Many area is allocated as constant data(usually about 1KB size)
> in libvirt.
> He plan to fix this issue(dynamical allocation(which you suggested)
> as next stage (Fedora 8 or later.)
>
> As a Fedora 7 phase solution,
> He choses constant data size for solving this issue.
> I also think 130KB is too big.
I just want to point out that 0.2.2 is the version released last week
and which should end up in Fedora 7, but further release will be pushed
as updates (as I submitted 0.2.2 for FC6 testing on Monday).
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group
http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/