[PATCH 08/11] qemuhotplugtest: Fix misleading comment on monitor unlock
There's a comment in testQemuHotplug() trying to explain why we
need to unlock the monitor object. Well, while it might have been
correct when being introduced, it's no long factually correct as
just any function (attach/detach/update) might talk to the
monitor and it expects the monitor to be unlocked (as it calls
qemuDomainObjEnterMonitor() + qemuDomainObjExitMonitor()).
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
---
tests/qemuhotplugtest.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/qemuhotplugtest.c b/tests/qemuhotplugtest.c
index b4c03d5374..9a1cf8ab2f 100644
--- a/tests/qemuhotplugtest.c
+++ b/tests/qemuhotplugtest.c
@@ -223,9 +223,8 @@ testQemuHotplug(const void *data)
priv = vm->privateData;
priv->mon = qemuMonitorTestGetMonitor(test_mon);
- /* XXX We need to unlock the monitor here, as
- * qemuDomainObjEnterMonitorInternal (called from qemuDomainChangeGraphics)
- * tries to lock it again */
+ /* We need to unlock the monitor here, as any function below talks
+ * (transitively) on the monitor. */
virObjectUnlock(priv->mon);
switch (test->action) {
--
2.39.2