Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Disable libxl build in RPM on Fedora < 16

On 03/18/2011 11:36 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >> The xen RPM in Fedora isn't new enough to support libxl builds >> yet. Disable it until Fedora 16 >> >> Q: What actually is the min required Xen ? Is xen 4.0.1 >> in fact sufficient ? If so I'll change this to s/16/15/ >> >> > Xen 4.0.x contains some "tech preview" libxenlight bits, but it is buggy > and missing quite a bit of functionality. Xen 4.1.0 is the first release > with a usable libxenlight IMO. Also, the API changed quite a bit between > Xen 4.0 and 4.1 and I have not attempted to make the libxl driver work > with the preview libxenlight. > Can we enhance the configure test (when there is no explicit --with-libxl) to reject the 4.0.x library, by requiring linking with a function that only exists in 4.1?