On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 23.03.2016 13:08, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 02:39:34PM +0300, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
>> 2016-03-23 14:34 GMT+03:00 Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>:
>>> RAther than have you re-post again, I'll commit just this patch
>>> with this IP & route stuff removed now.
>>
>>
>> Ok, no problem with this. If you apply only part, that creates tap
>> devices, this is good start for me.
>
> Ok it is merged - just resubmit your code to add IP & route stuff as a
> separate patch now.
>
Thing is, this breaks the build. 'make check' is failing now as it
really tries to create a tap device - we have used 'ethernet' type of
interface in our tests to avoid creating any device on the host. Mocking
all of the virNetDev* is going to be verbose. But I'm already working on it.
Oh damn, sorry I missed that - I mistakenly thought we skipped ethernet
devices in the tests, the same way we skip bridge devices and guess I
only ran syntax-check rather than check.
We could just quickly disable those ethernet tests if virNetDev mocking
is going to take some time. It would let us test type=bridge too once
we do it.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|