On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 06:09:39PM +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
Create a function to query the hypervisor for its list of known CPU model names. This is different from virConnectGetCPUModelNames, as this new function will determine the list of CPU models (and alias names) at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com> --- include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h | 6 ++++ src/driver-hypervisor.h | 8 +++++ src/libvirt-host.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/libvirt_public.syms | 1 + 4 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h b/include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h index 3112f2b676..5aaa001adb 100644 --- a/include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h +++ b/include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h @@ -962,6 +962,12 @@ int virConnectGetCPUModelNames(virConnectPtr conn, char ***models, unsigned int flags);
+int virConnectGetHypervisorCPUModelNames(virConnectPtr conn, + const char *arch, + char ***names, + char ***aliases, + unsigned int flags);
We have a notion of deprecation for CPU models. I wonder if we should include or omit deprecated CPU models by default, possibly determined based on a flag ? With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|