Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] Xen: Support cpu_weight and cpu_cap for Xen.
David Lutterkort wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 09:08 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> I can understand the need to make it easy for an user, I still don't
> think this means those tuning informations need to be associated to the
> domain definition, to me it is somehow orthogonal to the domain themselves
> and I would rather try to provide a good solution to the problem, than
> try to imitate how Xen was doing that.
>
Surely, users who set tuning parameters view them as part of their
domain description.
I agree. It appears the discussions around recent Linux-VServer patches
includes tuning information in the XML description so I'm a little
confused if this idea is being received positively or not.
I would like to avoid calling out to some other API for scheduling
parameters at domU definition if at all possible. Perhaps I've been
away too long and this functionality already exists :-), but not seeing
it in http://www.libvirt.org/format.html
Regards,
Jim