On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:15:36AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Latest GCC versions are unhappy with us treating an integer
arithmetic result as a boolean:
libvirt-utils.c: In function ‘virReallocN’:
libvirt-utils.c:111:23: warning: ‘*’ in boolean context, suggest ‘&&’ instead
[-Wint-in-bool-context]
if (!tmp && (size * count)) {
~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
Add an explicit comparison '!= 0' to keep it happy, since its
suggestion to use '&&' is nonsense.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>
---
libvirt-utils.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libvirt-utils.c b/libvirt-utils.c
index b8ac5e9..f7b4478 100644
--- a/libvirt-utils.c
+++ b/libvirt-utils.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ virReallocN(void *ptrptr,
return -1;
}
tmp = realloc(*(void**)ptrptr, size * count);
- if (!tmp && (size * count)) {
+ if (!tmp && ((size * count) != 0)) {
There is no need for the extra set of brackets:
if (!tmp && (size * count) != 0) {...}
but that's a matter of personal preference.
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina(a)redhat.com>