On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:17:26AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 12.02.2014 21:28, Eric Blake wrote:
>In general, the 'libvirt' metapackage should pull in all subpackages.
>Fix this for the wireshark subpackage created in commit f9ada9f.
>
>* libvirt.spec.in (Requires): Add dependency.
>
>Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>
>---
> libvirt.spec.in | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
>index d3e6048..2d57c71 100644
>--- a/libvirt.spec.in
>+++ b/libvirt.spec.in
>@@ -428,6 +428,9 @@ Requires: libvirt-daemon-driver-storage = %{version}-%{release}
> Requires: libvirt-daemon-driver-network = %{version}-%{release}
> Requires: libvirt-daemon-driver-nodedev = %{version}-%{release}
> %endif
>+ %if %{with_wireshark}
>+Requires: libvirt-wireshark = %{version}-%{release}
>+ %endif
> %endif
> Requires: libvirt-client = %{version}-%{release}
>
Aah, I see you've already pushed this one. However I have doubts
about it. The wireshark plugin is meant for developers, not ordinary
users. With this patch:
yum install libvirt
drags wireshark into the dependencies. Me, as a libvirt developer,
am comfortable with it. The ordinary libvirt users who just creates
dozen virtual machines may be not.
But I'm open to persuasion :)
I tend to agree - I don't think we should be pulling in the wireshark
RPM, so I'd suggest we revert this patch.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|