On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:34:21AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
On 27/06/16 20:28, Cole Robinson wrote:
> Similar to what virsh and virt-login-shell do
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350315
> ---
> I can't actually reproduce the bug, the backtrace is similar to
> 97973ebb7 which added the same fix for virt-login-shell, and
> that commit also mentions the randomness of reproducing...
>
> tools/virt-admin.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/virt-admin.c b/tools/virt-admin.c
> index 4acac65..7bff5c3 100644
> --- a/tools/virt-admin.c
> +++ b/tools/virt-admin.c
> @@ -1371,6 +1371,11 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
> return EXIT_FAILURE;
> }
>
> + if (virInitialize() < 0) {
> + vshError(ctl, "%s", _("Failed to initialize libvirt"));
> + return EXIT_FAILURE;
> + }
> +
> virFileActivateDirOverride(argv[0]);
>
> if (!vshInit(ctl, cmdGroups, NULL))
>
So, based on Luyao's feedback on the modified patch I attached to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350315, ACK if you replace
virInitialize call with virAdmInitialize (do not forget to export the
symbol through public syms :)...). I keep wondering though, why none of
us (you, me, and Martin) was able to reproduce it even once.
I would still rather not require users to need to call that
initialization function, but many other things in admin API went
differently than I planned them to, so it's just going to be another
todo in my user-friendliness branch (that I only have in my head), I
guess. Let's at least fix it for now. ACK.
Erik
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list