26 Jan
2012
26 Jan
'12
4:05 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:18:38AM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote:
Your changed version only has the same behaviour, if the user-passed-in function iter_func() never changes it->next, which you can't guarentee here. You need to keep the "next" copy.
Yes, the for loop was changed to a while loop recently exactly for that purpose:
I don't get it, your commit clearly introduced a hang in Boxes and my change fixes it back while also simplifying the code slightly. So I don't at all buy the 'while' being more 'reliable'. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124