On 04/08/2014 07:45 PM, yangzy.fnst(a)cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
> I am looking forward to any exchange of view of whether
> multi-tracer framework(ftrace including) is necessary.
>
Ping!
Regards
Yang Zhiyong
If you can propose patches that are minimally invasive (no more than ONE
additional conditional check when ftrace is disabled), and which do not
violate licensing, then we can look at them. But right now, the ball is
back in your court; I'm not sure what you are pinging for, because Dan's
analysis was pretty fair that the first version you posted is not ready
for inclusion, and that you may be fighting an uphill battle.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org