Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> writes:
Il 27/02/2013 17:19, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
>> >
>> > If it is meant as a prototype only, and the final command-line syntax
>> > would be with repeated keys, that's okay. I think that
Eduardo/Markus/I
>> > are focusing on the user interface, you're focusing in the
implementation.
>> >
>> > In the meanwhile, however, it seems to me that Eduardo can use
>> > QemuOptsVisitor---which can also hide the details and provide type safety.
> Whatever I use to implement it, I still need to know how the
> command-line syntax will look like, because we need to tell libvirt
> developers how they should write the QEMU command-line.
I don't think any syntax makes sense except cpus=A,cpus=B. How we
implement it is another story.
Agreed on both counts.